Comparing ThruPLEX HV PLUS to KAPA HyperPlus and NEBNext Ultra II FS

Introduction  


Results  

Table 1. Comparison of three leading NGS library preparation chemistries. Total time is representative of the range of time required to amplify inputs of 5 ng and 200 ng with each chemistry to yield sufficient Illumina-compatible, dual-indexed library for target enrichment. ThruPLEX DNA-Seq HV is the only single-tube workflow and chemistry which does not require adapter dilution, intermediate cleanup, or post-ligation size selection. The culmination of these features is the quickest protocol with the least amount of hands-on time.

The ThruPLEX HV PLUS library preparation system expands the coveted single-tube workflow of the ThruPLEX HV kits with a modified template preparation step that now includes an enzymatic fragmentation module in the same template preparation conditions (Figure 1, Table 1). Using this enzymatic fragmentation module, the ThruPLEX HV PLUS kits provide optimal protocols to generate DNA fragments of 300 and 450 bp (Figure 2). Fragment size can be modulated by simply varying the in‑reaction concentration of fragmentation enzyme, thereby eliminating the need for input-specific reaction times or extra time for mechanical fragmentation. Furthermore, the ThruPLEX HV PLUS system decreases hands-on time by eliminating the need for adapter dilution and protocol optimization (Table 1). No matter what size fragment or sample input type, the total workflow time remains consistent.

Figure 2. Bioanalyzer analysis of libraries prepared using ThruPLEX DNA-Seq HV PLUS. Libraries were prepared from 5 ng of Control Human gDNA using ThruPLEX DNA-Seq HV PLUS. Post library amplification, libraries were purified following the AMPure XP protocol. An aliquot of purified library was diluted to 5 ng/μl in TE buffer, and 1 μl of this diluted sample was loaded onto a Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA Analysis chip (Agilent Technologies). The blue trace is a library generated from the 300-bp protocol, and the red trace is a library generated from the 450-bp protocol.

Improved library preparation

Preparing NGS libraries from input material of a low starting concentration can lead to a library pool of poor complexity. This can be further diminished by a low input volume and template damage introduced during mechanical shearing. To combat this, the ThruPLEX HV PLUS library preparation system accommodates a large input volume of 30 µl and utilizes enzymatic fragmentation.

Starting with samples of low concentration requires PCR amplification to enrich for a pool of sequenceable libraries and increase the overall yield. Regions of high GC content contain strong secondary structures and can introduce PCR bias by resisting denaturation and amplification. This bias can lead to low yields, uneven representation of coverage, and low coverage depth in regions of interest. Through reformulation and workflow optimization, ThruPLEX HV PLUS ensures accurate representation of the original material by removing bias and providing substantial improvements specifically for coverage of regions with extreme GC composition.

Uniform library coverage across input levels

Sequencing libraries must accurately and proportionally cover a given sample’s complete sequence to faithfully represent the input material. This becomes increasingly more challenging as input concentrations are reduced, as the chances of uniformly covering the sample decreases. Additionally, at lower input concentrations, reproducibility can be compromised. The ThruPLEX DNA-Seq HV PLUS kit demonstrates coverage uniformity across the input range (Figure 3). Importantly, at the lowest recommended input value, 5 ng, the ThruPLEX HV PLUS Kit still performs well with superb reproducibility (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Reproducibility and uniform coverage across input levels. Correlation plots are shown for replicate library preparations generated by ThruPLEX DNA-Seq HV PLUS with 5 and 200 ng of NA12878 DNA and downsampled to 5 million total reads. Coverage of each 100-kb region of hg19 was compared across inputs. Comparison of two independent 5-ng library preps (right), and two different starting inputs of 5 and 200 ng (left), demonstrate the high reproducibility of the system.

Competitive library coverage uniformity

Generation of high-complexity libraries is critical for achieving even coverage throughout the genome for whole genome sequencing. When compared to KAPA HyperPlus and NEBNext Ultra II FS, libraries generated using ThruPLEX DNA-Seq HV PLUS show coverage much closer to ideal normalized coverage (Figure 4). In intermediate GC compositions, all three kits perform similarly. As the GC content increases, the ThruPLEX DNA-Seq HV PLUS Kit data remain true to the ideal normalized coverage, while those of KAPA and NEB kits diverge dramatically. This holds true for both 5-ng and 50-ng sample inputs, further highlighting the ThruPLEX HV PLUS advantage in uniform library coverage across sample inputs (Table 2).

Figure 4. Superior coverage uniformity. Libraries were prepared in triplicate from 5-ng and 50-ng inputs of NA12878 gDNA. Libraries were generated following ThruPLEX DNA-Seq HV PLUS, KAPA HyperPlus, or NEBNext Ultra II FS protocols. Paired-end sequencing was performed on a NextSeq® 500/550 Mid Output Kit v2.5 (150 Cycles), and total reads were downsampled to 5 million total reads. The vertical blue bars represent the expected GC content distribution using 100-bp windows.


Conclusion  


Methods